Hornilla vs. atty. salunat essay

On this issue, the following disquisition is enlightening: The possibility for conflict of interest here is universally recognized. There is conflict of interest when a lawyer represents inconsistent interests of two or more opposing parties. Navarro recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for six 6 months.

PPSTAet al. Conflict of Interest, 94 Harv. Conflict of Interest, 94 Harv.

Hornilla vs Salunat

Kennedy is its founding member and managing spouse. Considering however, that this is his first offense, we find the penalty of suspension, recommended in IBP Resolution No. He merely assured the Board that the truth will come out and that the case before the Ombudsman will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, considering that respondents therein are not public officials, but private employees.

In brief, if he argues for one client, this argument will be opposed by him when he argues for the other Hornilla vs. atty. salunat essay. Ricafort was himself guilty of gross violation of his oath of office amounting to gross misconduct, malpractice and unethical conduct for filing trumped-up charges against him and Atty.

The Board of Governors thereafter adopted Resolution No. Ricafort who instigated, orchestrated and indiscriminately filed the said cases against members of the PPSTA and its Board.

To do so would be tantamount to representing conflicting interests, which is prohibited by the Code of Professional Responsibility.

The office by Fort Campbell is even being used by a church for services and other meetings. Complainants contend that respondent was guilty of conflict of interest because he was engaged by the PPSTA, of which complainants were members, and was being paid out of its corporate funds where complainants have contributed.

In brief, if he argues for one client, this argument will be opposed by him when he argues for the other client. XV dated June 29,to be too harsh. In brief, if he argues for one client, this argument will be opposed by him when he argues for the other client. Ricafort was himself guilty of gross violation of his oath of office amounting to gross misconduct, malpractice and unethical conduct for filing trumped-up charges against him and Atty.

Conflict of Interest, 94 Harv. Yet, he appeared as counsel of record for the respondent Board of Directors in the said case. The test is whether or not in behalf of one client, it is the lawyers duty to fight for an issue or claim, but it is his duty to oppose it for the other client.

Therefore, respondent is guilty of representing conflicting interests. United States Acoustics Corporation, F. In the said case, he filed a Manifestation of Extreme Urgency wherein he prayed for the dismissal of the complaint against his clients, the individual Board Members.

By way of Special and Affirmative Defenses, respondent averred that complainant Atty. Asset Privatization Trust v.

Benedicto Hornilla vs Ernesto Salunat

Anent the SEC case, respondent alleged that the same was being handled by the law firm of Atty. After investigation, Commissioner Lydia A.

Every meeting is closed with a supplication. By way of Special and Affirmative Defenses, respondent averred that complainant Atty.On November 21,Benedicto Hornilla and Federico D.

Ricafort filed an administrative complaint [1] with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Commission on Bar Discipline, against respondent Atty. Ernesto S. Salunat for illegal and unethical practice and conflict of interest. Hornilla vs. Atty. Salunat Essay Sample.

A lawyer shall not represent conflicting interests except bywritten consent of all concerned given after a full disclosure of the facts.| FACTS: * This administrative case is filed by Benedicto Hornilla and Federico Ricafort against agronumericus.como Salunat for illegal and unethical practice and conflict of interest.

On November 21,Benedicto Hornilla and Federico D. Ricafort filed an administrative complaint 1 with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Commission on Bar Discipline, against respondent Atty.

Ernesto S. Salunat for illegal and unethical practice and conflict of interest. They alleged that respondent is a member of the ASSA Law and. LEGAL ETHICS Irene Gie S. Dormile LLB-1 Estrellado HORNILLA VS.

Hornilla vs. Atty. Salunat Essay Sample

ATTY. SALUNAT BENEDICTO HORNILLA and ATTY. FEDERICO D. RICAFORT, complainants vs. agronumericus.comO S. ALSO READ Hornilla vs. Atty. Salunat Essay Sample Biblical Integration Christianity plays a immense function in this house.

and it was one of the major factors which drew me to. LEGAL ETHICS HORNILLA VS. ATTY. SALUNAT Irene Gie S. Dormile LLB-1 Estrellado BENEDICTO HORNILLA and ATTY. FEDERICO D. RICAFORT, complainants vs. agronumericus.comO S.

Download
Hornilla vs. atty. salunat essay
Rated 0/5 based on 60 review